What Comes After Postmodernism?
|Postmodernism: another 'ism' or the end of art history? There is a great pressure to accept postmodernism as the be-all & end-all of art. By taking the stance that there can be nothing new or innovative under the sun, that the only valid expression is to rehash older work (with a side order of irony), postmodernism tries to exclude even the possibility of criticism.
Postmodernism tries to have it's cake and eat it: you cannot create anew but merely refer backwards, but to question this assumption is to be niave and shallow. In the worst case, you might even try to be positive, or think that your work might improve anything (a yell of horror as Modernism rears it's ugly head!).
If postmodernism is the end of art history, then it is merely a false end, a blip in the cycle of new schools of art, of the avante-garde becoming the establishment with each generation of new artists.
The buds of a new movement are growing, fertilised by Suzi Gablik# among others, for art that is involved, that has a connection to people, that does not give up on giving something.
Part of the problem is 'newness' and 'innovation'. Is there a place for such concepts within art? Postmodernism sweeps the problem under the carpet by issueing a stern NO! without actually exploring the issues. We have a semantic problem. What do we mean by these two words? If we mean work that is based on nothing before it, that has no echoes of what we have seen before, then I am inclined to agree that this is highly unlikely in this age of information saturation. If we mean the familiar or semi-familiar seen from a different angle, filtered through the sensibilities of another person, that is another matter.
It is no use striving for the 'cutting edge' in art, there is no such thing unless you are a slavish follower of art fashions (oh you can't possible like that picture dear, sub-Pollocks are so last season). Instead, strive for the inside edge, hone your sensibilities, and use them like a scalpel to form something individual, not 'new' or 'innovative' or 'in'.
Artists have said 'I have produced this work for myself, bugger the audience'. This is not art. This is barely psychotherapy.
New & Upcoming | Home | Gallery | Photography As... | Cameras | Commercial | Contact | Links | Copyright & Site Info
This page last updated in August 2001